[Liars-will-be-found-out example. We must overcome to be free!] Mike Adams: Linguistic analysis of Rand Paul’s endorsement of Romney contradicts his words – Rand Paul is disgusted with him!

Fascinating and likely right-on analysis!

To those who have the propensity to lie, remember that liars don’t go to heaven, you all. It’s not worth it. Don’t compromise.

Rev. 21:7- 8

He who overcomes, I will give him these things. I will be his God, and he will be my son. 

But for the cowardly, unbelieving, sinners, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their part is in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.”

Let’s be free!

– –

From: Natural News

Linguistic analysis of Rand Paul’s endorsement of Romney contradicts his words: Rand Paul is disgusted with him!

[…]

Linguistics and intonation

If you watch Rand Paul deliver his announcement, pay particular attention to the part where he says:

But you know, now that the nominating process is over, tonight I’m uh happy to announce that I’m gonna be supporting Governor Romney.

During this entire sentence, his voice and intonation stay relatively high, in the “optimistic” range, including as he’s talking about his father. But the minute he utters the words “Governor Romney,” two things happen:

• The pitch of his voice drops sharply.
• The strength of his voice tapers off, almost as if the last part of “Romney” has no power behind it.

The overall feeling associated with this delivery is one of disgust. It’s almost as if Rand Paul is describing someone he is disappointed with or despises.

He most certainly did not do the things you would expect to hear if he were excited about Romney:

• Raising the pitch of his voice.
• Increasing the strength of his voice. “Government ROMNEY!”
• Smiling.

That these telltale signs are completely absent, and that he instead dropped both the pitch and power of his voice, tells you that Rand Paul does not himself believe what he is saying!

He sounds disappointed in himself and very much uninspired about Romney. It is delivered asa surrender to disgust. This is hardly the tone we would expect to hear from someone who is excited about the endorsement.

Again, watch Rand Paul’s announcement to follow what I’m explaining here:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c5odNzKVbk]

Talking about his father vs. talking about Romney

There is also a subtle but very real difference between the way Sen. Rand Paul talks about his father versus talking about Romney. Here are the overriding emotions as he speaks:

Happy, confident, expressive:

My first choice has always been my father, I campaigned for him when I was eleven years old, he’s still my first pick…

Reserved, cautious, neutral:

..but you know now that the nominating process is over, tonight I’m happy to announce that I’m going to be supporting…

Depressed, disgusted:

Governor Romney.

Micro-expressions analysis

Immediately after Rand Paul utters “Governor Romney,” his face freezes. His usual pattern of rapid blinking and eyebrow hikes grinds to a virtual halt. He goes “stone cold” for a few seconds.

He only smiles again when Sean Hannity mentions his father:

If you didn’t support your father, by the way, I would really question…

Rand Paul SMILES (i.e. he likes his father)

The logic

From there, Sean Hannity asks Rand Paul why he decided to support Mitt Romney. The answers that Rand Paul gives make no sense.

He starts out by citing a completely irrelevant, distracting “similarity” which is that both himself and Romney have fathers who once ran for President. Huh?

This is entirely irrelevant to his politics, philosophies and beliefs. Saying you would endorse someone for President because their dad did something that your dad also did strikes of a fabricated, poorly-thought-out series of excuses scripted as talking points.

Then he goes on to say that Governor Romney comes from “a big family” which is just like his own big family. Huh?

Does Rand Paul really think the American people give a damn how big his family is? What they want to know is how these bureaucrats are going to restore liberty and freedom for ALL families. The “big family” comparison is yet another scripted talking point.

He then goes on to say something that finally makes sense, that Romney and he share “family values.” That’s a reasonable point of discussion.

After that, he goes into total spin mode, describing how he met and talked with Romney, and how Romney was “very supportive” of the idea of auditing the Fed, but that claim doesn’t mean anything, especially when Romney is a banker globalist.

Sen Rand Paul’s endorsement for Romney has more deceptive layers than Obama’s birth certificate

What does all this means? If this linguistic and micro-expressions analysis is to be believed, it means Sen. Rand Paul despises Mitt Romney. That, in turn, means he held his nose and made a deal. Whether that deal is for a possible VP spot is being hotly debated right now, but it seems clear some kind of deal was made.

This is the very reason why Rand Paul is being berated by his (former?) support base: You don’t make a deal with the devil! Perhaps Alex Jones said it best in this up-front, uncensored and aggressively stated special video message to Rand Paul and Ron Paul

Entire Article Here

Related:

Alex Jones: Ron Paul, Don’t Destroy Yourself — And don’t destroy the liberty movement you helped build either. That goes double for the junior senator Rand Paul: you can’t win by joining the “lesser of two evils,” because it is still a submission to evil.

Alex Jones: Rand Paul Joins The Dark Side! — “Paulistas, we never compromised one hair during this whole journey. Are you willing to begin compromising now?”

Asbury Revival, 1970: “‘Dr. Kinlaw, I am a liar. Now what do I do?’ … Three days later, she came to me radiant, and she said, ‘Dr. Kinlaw, I’m free!’”

Who-Goes-To-Heaven Scriptures — Narrow is the Way | Who are the Children of God?

Leave a Reply