Doing an online search, I had a hard time finding an article challenging Nat Geo’s blatant reengineering of society in this edition, even when I included words like ‘God’ in my search. Mostly only articles supporting NatGeo would come up, even then! Google used to post everything, but they now seem to have a big filter, waiting until later to post articles they don’t like.

One one hand, National Geographic has done outstanding photographic work, on the other, they have been anti-God for as long as l can remember, going out of their way to promote the false science/religion of evolution, endlessly saying “millions” and “billions of years.” And it seemed the more breasts they could post the better — to normalize nudity in our culture.

But what they’re doing here is as blatant as it gets, which this author nails!

– –

From: whatdidyousay.org

IS ‘NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC’ PROMOTING CHILD ENDANGERMENT AND SEX ABUSE?

AUTHORED BY GARY DEMAR DECEMBER 19, 2016

JUST WHAT MY WIFE AND I WANTED TO SEE ON THE FRONT COVER OF NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC MAGAZINE AFTER WE GOT OUR 8-YEAR-OLD GRANDSON A SUBSCRIPTION, A 9-YEAR-OLD-BOY WHO BELIEVES HE’S REALLY A GIRL. MY WIFE CALLED THE SUBSCRIPTION OFFICE OF NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC ON SATURDAY AND CANCELED THE SUBSCRIPTION AND FOUND OUT THAT OTHERS HAVE BEEN DOING THE SAME.

[…] “‘When I was born, doctors said I was a boy, but I knew in my heart I was a girl,’ Jackson explained in her first video. ‘So I may have some boy body parts, but that’s not wrong, that is OK.’”

national-geographic

This boy did not make the cover of the magazine. National Geographic chose to put him on the cover as sexual exploitation. … Today’s defenders of this type of sexual insanity, in the words of Daniel Patrick Moynihan, “defined deviancy down”1 so that what was morally shocking twenty years ago is acceptable and promoted as an enlightened form of morality. Robert Bork explains the phenomenon:

“Emile Durkheim, a founder of sociology, posited that there is a limit to the amount of deviant behavior any community can ‘afford to recognize.’ As behavior worsens, the community adjusts its standards so that conduct once thought reprehensible is no longer deemed so.”2

At the same time, these same moral misfits are defining their own brand of moral deviancy up. What was considered morally normal thirty years ago – two parents of the opposite sex married and living together, participation in the Boy Scouts and being protected from homosexual predators, rejecting a pro-death culture, and stay-at-home moms – is now

“portrayed as oppressive and shot through with pathologies, ‘As part of the vast social project of moral leveling,’ [Charles] Krauthammer wrote, ‘it is not enough for the deviant to be normalized. The normal must be found to be deviant.’ This situation is thoroughly perverse. …”3

This type of moral deviancy has infected the mind of a nine-year-old boy who fancies himself to be a “transgender rights activist.” Instead of debunking the falsity of the claim, the folks at National Geographic promote it as some kind of moral high ground.

Avery Jackson knew in his heart he was a girl? Give me a break. He knows no such thing. This kid is confused, and his parents, the LGBT propagandists, and the editors at National Geographic are enabling and legitimizing a form of sexual abuse. […]

National Geographic is now plumbing the depths of pseudoscience. None of this nonsense should surprise us given the fact that fake news and fake science have been the modus operandi of the Left for decades – everything from evolution and abortion to the claim that the climate is warming/changing because of humans and cow farts.

If this type of propaganda is promoted as the new morality, how many second and third graders might come to believe they are not what their obvious sex organs tell them they are? Could a child call the local government child protective agencies and claim that he or she is being abused because his or her parents won’t allow him or her be what he or she really is? What if a boy confides in a teacher that he’s really a girl, but his parents won’t allow him to be and dress as a girl?

Will the State intervene and take the child away to ensure that the “appropriate” steps are taken to accommodate the child’s “true gender”? Maybe the child is taken from his parents and placed in a safe “transgender family” environment. Will sex reassignment surgery be performed against the will of the parents to mollify the sexual confusion of the child?

Entire Article

Related:

I wrote a warning here, recently, about Nat Geo’s agenda even back then; though, their photography has been truly amazing!: (film) Chased by the Light A Photographic Journey with Jim Brandenburg — Moved early in life to swap a hunting rifle for a camera